West Marin Analysis

We’re mapping where children and families in West Marin face the greatest barriers and connecting those places to the schools they attend. This mirrors the Canal Promise Neighborhood approach: start with place, layer on data, and translate insights into action with district and community partners.

 

The Process

  • Geography first. We identify high-need census tracts (e.g., Tomales, 1330) using indicators such as children living in poverty, median household income, percentage of renters, and percentage of people of color. Note: West Marin comprises four school districts: Shoreline (the largest), Lagunitas, Bolinas-Stinson, and Nicasio (the smallest).

  • School linkages. For each tract, we list the zoned public schools (elementary/middle/high) serving families, layering on outcomes for 3rd grading, 8th grade math, and college readiness (UC/CSU a-g eligibility), as well as percentage of students of color.

Key Takeaways, Next Steps and Resources

      Key Takeaways

  • Early literacy: Overall third-grade reading is roughly back near baseline but a bit lower (-5% pts since 2015), while Students of Color are up (+8% pts). Economically Disadvantaged improved meaningfully; EL dipped slightly. Tiny cohorts = big year-to-year swings, but the equity lift is real.

  • Math split: Shoreline overall –6% pts (2015→2025), with Lagunitas up strongly (+43% pts), Tomales SoC improving (+6% pts), and West Marin down on very small N—site-to-site variation is the story.

  • College readiness (A-G centerpiece): Down vs 2018 (e.g., Tomales High 82% → 41%, –41% pts; 2015 → 2025 +1% pts). Dashboard “overall readiness” also fell (2019→2025), suggesting this isn’t just A-G—overall readiness pathways softened, too.

  • Postsecondary pipeline: College enrollment at Tomales High shows overall down since the early baseline while SoC rose (e.g., 2013→2024: All Students 69%→58%, SoC 50%→63%). College completion moved up (All Students +18% pts, SoC +48% pts 2013→2024), implying that students who do enroll are more likely to finish, but fewer enroll to begin with.

     Proposed Next Steps: Now → Next

  • Early literacy (K–3): Are core phonics/fluency routines consistent—and what’s actually working for ELs?

  • Algebra readiness (6–8): Where are the biggest concept drop-offs—and how are teams doing quick re-teaches now?

  • A-G completion: Which requirements trip students up most—and what low-lift schedule/credit fixes are feasible?

  • Enrollment → persistence: Where do seniors get stuck (FAFSA, verification, summer steps)—and which partner supports help?

  • Rural logistics & small-N: How do transport/closures affect learning time—and how do we avoid over-reading tiny cohorts?

     

      Additional Resources

  • Note that the West Marin Early Learning Collaborative Action Network (ELCAN) has an active Clear Impact Scorecard page that captures their work through an RBA lens, including measuring outcomes and performance.

  • Explore the range of programs and services partners are offering in West Marin (and the rest of the county) on our dashboard.

Mapping the Data

  • Click a tract area to see its profile of key census-level data and the default school pathway (TK-8/9-12).

  • Compare tracts to spot patterns in levels of student poverty, as well as student outcomes. Note: each tract is shaded based on the level of children living in poverty.

  • Click school icons for additional information, including percentage of students of color, as well as outcomes data.

Census and School Data

School Icons

California Healthy Places Index foR WEST MARIN

Click image to dive deeper into the data

Dig Deeper into the Data

3rd Grade Reading

3rd Grade Reading (CAASPP ELA)

Shoreline Unified (Cohort sizes too small for other Bolinas, Lagunitas, and Nicasio schools)

Note: white student cohort sizes too small to represent

California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP), 2024-25

Trends: 2015 → 2024

  • Overall: 55% → 50% (–5% pts)
  • Students of Color: 32% → 40% (+8% pts)
  • White: 86% → 64% (–22% pts; tiny cohorts = volatile)
  • Hispanic/Latino: 30% → 40% (+10% pts)
  • English Learner: 27% → 24% (–3% pts)
  • Economically Disadvantaged: 19% → 46% (+27% pts)

What jumps out

  • Overall nearly back to baseline (–5% pts vs 2015), despite the dips we saw mid-series.
  • Equity lift: SoC (+8% pts) and Econ Disadvantaged (+27% pts) improved vs 2015.
  • White declines from a very high baseline; but cohorts are small, so single-student shifts move the rate a lot.
  • EL slightly down, suggesting language-aligned supports in early literacy remain a lever.

Why it’s still behind (potential causes to explore)

  • Foundational recovery gaps: Not every cohort fully re-built K–2 phonemic awareness/phonics fluency.
  • Small-N volatility: A few student moves (or school mix shifts) can swing subgroup rates by double digits.
  • EL scaffolds + core alignment: Tight coupling of ELD with structured literacy likely to help.
  • Attendance + rural logistics: Weather/road issues and long commutes interrupt sequential instruction and progress monitoring.
  • Intervention dosage/materials: Consistency of Tier-2 minutes and decodable text access influences catch-up velocity.
8th Grade Math

8th Grade Math (CAASPP)

Shoreline Unified

Note: white student cohort sizes too small to represent

Lagunitas Elementary

Note: white and students of color cohort sizes too small to represent

California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP), 2024-25

Shoreline (All Schools)

  • Trends (2015 → 2025): Overall 28% → 22% (–6% pts); Students of Color 22% → 17% (–5% pts)
  • 2025 snapshot: Overall 8/37 → 22%; SoC 3/18 → 17%

Lagunitas Elementary

  • Trends (2015 → 2025): Overall 19% → 62% (+43% pts); SoC: Cohort size too small
  • 2025 snapshot: Overall 11/18 → 62%

Tomales Elementary

  • Trends (2015 → 2025): Overall 29% → 24% (–5% pts); SoC 19% → 25% (+6% pts)
  • 2025 snapshot: Overall 6/25 → 24%; SoC 3/12 → 25%

West Marin Elementary

  • Trends (2015 → 2025): Overall 25% → 17% (–8% pts); SoC: (no 2015 row; 2025 very small cohort)
  • 2025 snapshot: Overall 2/12 → 17%; SoC 0/6 → 0% (tiny N; interpret cautiously)

What jumps out

  • District is down 6% pts vs 2015.
  • Lagunitas overall pops to 62% (+43% pts vs 2015).
  • Tomales softens overall but SoC improves (+6% pts).
  • West Marin overall slides; SoC reads 0% in 2025 on a tiny cohort (super volatile).

Why it’s still behind (potential causes to explore)

  • Algebra-readiness pipeline gaps (fractions/ratio → linear functions) persist through grades 6–8.
  • Small-school constraints: multi-grade sections and limited intervention blocks reduce steady Tier-2 time.
  • Pacing/coherence: inconsistent problem-based curriculum with daily fluency/spiral review → skill decay between units.
  • Formative cadence: not enough item-level checks → slower re-teaching before spring.
  • Attendance & rural logistics: weather/roads/commutes disrupt multi-day concept arcs.
  • Language load: uneven math-language scaffolds (vocab, representations) can undercut SoC/EL performance.
College Readiness

College Readiness: A–G Completion (C- or better)

Shoreline Unified (Tomales High)

Note: white student cohort sizes too small to represent

College Readiness (UC/CSU a-g eligibility) outcomes California Department of Education, 2024-25

The above California Dashboard College/Career Indicator (CCI) uses several variables to measure college and career readiness, including completing advanced coursework like AP or IB exams, earning college credit through dual enrollment, or completing a Career Technical Education (CTE) pathway

Trends:

  • All Students 2015 → 2025: +1% pts (40% → 41%) – bouncing back after landing to its lowest point last year
  • Students of Color 2015 → 2025: +13% pts (28% → 41%) – up since baseline, but still lower than the high-water mark of 82% in 2018

What jumps out

  • 2019 was a high-water mark (small cohort: 23/28 A–G), and 2025’s 11/27 explains the –41% pts drop—small-N volatility matters, but the multi-year direction is still down.
  • A–G and overall readiness both declined: California Dashboard doesn’t show a compensating rise in other “Prepared” pathways big enough to offset A–G losses.
  • Risk points look upstream: Given the 8th-grade math/ELA patterns, the A–G slide likely reflects pipeline issues (course placement, Algebra readiness, and credit accumulation), not just senior-year steps.

Why it’s still behind (potential causes to explore)

  • Course access + schedule grid: Limited sections for lab science/world language/upper-math in a rural HS can block A–G completion.
  • Math readiness: Gaps from middle grades (fractions/linear → Algebra I) drive course grades and credit progress.
  • Counseling bandwidth & checkpoints: Without tight A–G audits (by end of 9th/10th) and proactive schedule fixes, students arrive in 12th short a requirement.
  • Attendance/logistics: Storms/roads/work/family responsibilities = missed labs and make-up windows that matter for A–G.
  • Alternative pathway alignment: Some CTE/dual-enrollment wins may count for Dashboard “Prepared,” but don’t always satisfy A–G—worth aligning where possible.
College Enrollment

College Enrollment (first fall)

Shoreline Unified (Tomales High)

National Student Clearinghouse, 2024 Graduates

Trends:

  • All Students 2013 → 2024: –11% pts (69% → 58%) – down from mid-2010s highs.
    Counts: 2013 = 34/49; 2024 = 18/31.
  • Students of Color 2013 → 2024: +13% pts (50% → 63%) – up since baseline, but below the high-water mark of ~81% in 2021.
    Counts: 2013 = 9/18; 2024 = 10/16.

What jumps out

  • Diverging long-arc: Since 2013, SoC rose while overall fell, narrowing the gap. But both are below mid-2010s peaks (overall peaked 86% in 2014; SoC peaked 81% in 2021).
  • Small-N volatility: A swing of 3–5 students can move rates by 10+ % pts (e.g., 18/31 vs 21/31). Interpret year-to-year with caution.
  • Recent softening from peak: SoC eased from 81% (2021) to 63% (2024); overall hovered in the 60s through 2023 before landing 58% in 2024.

Why it’s still behind (potential causes to explore)

  • Affordability & process frictions: FAFSA/CAFSA declines, verification barriers, and late summer steps reduce actual matriculation even when students are “ready.”
  • Program match & proximity: Limited nearby 2-yr/4-yr options and transport add melt in a rural context.
  • Academic momentum: Middle-grade math/ELA dips echo into senior grades and placement, affecting enrollment follow-through.
  • Advising capacity: Thin senior advising (app/aid/placement checklists) leaves tasks unfinished after graduation.
  • Family/work trade-offs: Local employment pulls some grads directly to work, especially when aid/placement is uncertain.
College Completion

College Completion (degree within six years)

Shoreline Unified (Tomales High)

National Student Clearinghouse, 2024 Graduates

Trends

  • All Students 2013 → 2024: +18% pts (34% → 52%) – steady rise over the decade, highest in 2024.
    Counts: 2013 = 20/58 (34%); 2024 = 15/29 (52%).
  • Students of Color 2013 → 2024: +48% pts (5% → 53%) – sharp improvement from a very low baseline, highest in 2024.
    Counts: 2013 = 1/21 (5%); 2024 = 9/17 (53%).

What jumps out

  • New high-water mark in 2024 for both All Students (52%) and SoC (53%) — despite small cohorts, the improvement is large versus 2013.
  • Equity lift: SoC completion increased +48% pts since 2013; the SoC rate now slightly edges the overall rate (53% vs 52%) in 2024.
  • Small-N dynamics: Cohorts are small (e.g., 29 overall, 17 SoC in 2024). A swing of 3–5 graduates can move rates by 10–15% pts—interpret single-year changes cautiously.

Why it’s still behind (potential causes to explore)

  • Pipeline & persistence: Completion reflects long-run supports across advising, financial aid renewal, course sequencing, and transfer; early cracks (math/ELA readiness, attendance) echo years later.
  • Melt between enrollment → year 2: Students who enroll but don’t pass gateway math/English or who face aid/transport barriers often stop out.
  • Pathway fit: Without strong advising into coherent 2-year/4-year pathways (and clear transfer maps), momentum stalls—especially for part-time students.
Chronic Absence

West Marin Chronic Absence (missing 10% or more classes)

West Marin Chronic Absence (missing 10% or more classes)

Trends: 2019 → 2025

  • Students of Color: 17% → 20% (+3% pts)
  • White: 17% → 20% (+3% pts)
  • Hispanic/Latino: 16% → 20% (+4% pts)
  • Overall: 18% → 21% (+3% pts). Peaked at 41% in 2021–22, then improved but not back to baseline
  • Economically Disadvantaged: 19% → 22% (+3% pts)
  • English Learner: 14% → 23% (+9% pts)

What jumps out

  • Still elevated vs. pre-COVID: Despite progress since the 2021–22 peak, overall chronic absence remains about 3 percentage points above 2019 and approaching double the countywide averages of 13% and 15% for Overall and Students of Color respectively.

Why it’s still behind (potential causes to explore)

  • Distance & transportation in West Marin: Long routes, limited transit, and occasional late/limited buses can turn small disruptions into repeated absences.

  • Weather & road disruptions: Storms, flooding, slides, and rural road closures can cluster multi-day absences.

  • Health & wellbeing: Lingering waves of respiratory illness, mental-health factors, and limited nearby care options can depress steady attendance.

  • Work & family responsibilities: Seasonal/agricultural/tourism employment patterns and sibling care can pull students out intermittently.

  • Housing & stability: Moves, long commutes from more affordable areas, or unstable housing can increase sporadic misses.

  • Engagement & access: Language access for EL families, inconsistent two-way communication, and late identification into Tier 2/3 supports can delay interventions.

  • School operations: Bell schedules, limited make-up options, and post-pandemic policy shifts (early leniency) may still dampen day-to-day attendance habits.

School Data Table
School % Students of Color % English Learners Chronic Absence (SoC) 3rd Grade Reading (SoC) 8th Grade Math (SoC) College Readiness (SoC)
Bodega Bay Elementary
78%
44%
7%
Cohort size too small
No Indicator
No indicator
Bolinas-Stinson Elementary
23%
13%
Cohort size too small
Cohort size too small
No indicator
No indicator
Inverness Elementary
66%
32%
7%
Cohort size too small
No indicator
No indicator
Lagunitas Elementary
29%
3%
Cohort size too small
Cohort size too small
Cohort size too small
No indicator
Nicasio Elementary
62%
Cohort size too small
Cohort size too small
Cohort size too small
Cohort size too small
No indicator
San Geronimo Valley Elementary
31%
8%
Cohort size too small
Cohort size too small
No indicator
No indicator
Tomales Elementary
64%
36%
29%
50%
25%
No indicator
Tomales High
74%
21%
31%
No indicator
No indicator
36%
West Marin Elementary
68%
29%
15%
Cohort size too small
Cohort size too small
No indicator
Shoreline Unified District
69%
30%
23%
40%
17%
36%
Census Data Table
Tract Schools Served % People of Color Median Household Income % Children in Poverty % Renters
Lagunitas Elementary, San Geronimo Valley Elementary, Archie Williams High
22%
$142k
27%
20%
Bolinas School, Tamalpais High
15%
$102k
14%
24%
Inverness School, West Marin Elementary, Tomales High
10%
$79k
0%
26%
Bodega Bay School, Nicasio Elementary, Tomales Elementary, West Marin Elementary, and Tomales High
12%
$127k
2%
35%